By We have long noted that Democrats hold as an article of faith that there are two sets of rules: one for liberals and one for everyone else. Now, a leftwing prosecutor in Minnesota has revealed that even violence won’t change things. The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office recently announced that a state employee accused of causing more than $20,000 in damage to multiple Tesla vehicles will not face criminal charges, prompting sharp criticism from law enforcement and local residents.
The suspect, 33-year-old Dylan Bryan Adams, allegedly defaced at least six Teslas in a Minneapolis neighborhood while walking his dog, according to police reports. Surveillance footage reportedly captured Adams keying the vehicles and stripping away paint, acts Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara described as “felonious.”
NEW: Minneapolis Police Department rips far-left DA Mary Moriarty for declining to charge a Minnesota government employee who caused $20,000 in damages to Teslas.
No wonder why Minneapolis is turning into a sh*t hole.
Police provided evidence of 33-year-old Dylan Bryan Adams… pic.twitter.com/g7h7lnjnks
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 22, 2025
Despite what police characterize as clear evidence of multiple property crimes, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty announced that her office would not pursue criminal prosecution. Instead, Adams has been offered a diversion program—a decision meant to allow him to keep his job with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and pay restitution.
“This is an approach taken in many property crime cases and helps to ensure the individual keeps their job and can pay restitution, as well as reducing the likelihood of repeat offenses,” the county attorney’s office said in a statement reported by The New York Post.
Chief Brian O’Hara expressed deep frustration with the decision, emphasizing that investigators had spent significant time and resources building a solid case.
“The Minneapolis Police Department did its job,” O’Hara said. “It identified and investigated a crime trend, arrested a suspect, and presented a thorough case file for charging consideration. Any frustration with this decision should be directed at the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office.”
He noted that at least six individuals were victimized by the alleged vandalism, with damages totaling over $20,000. “Our investigators are always frustrated when the cases they poured their hearts into are declined,” he said. “In my experience, the victims in these cases often feel the same.”
Moriarty, who became the county’s chief prosecutor in early 2023, has drawn scrutiny for her progressive approach to criminal justice. Her first week in office was marked by the dismissal of charges in a high-profile rape case due to alleged misconduct by a government attorney—a move that critics cited as emblematic of her lenient policies.
Liberals have gone insane over Tesla due to Elon Musk’s attempts to cut federal spending. A recent investigation, however, revealed that it’s mostly professional activists performing “astroturf.”
Climate activists tagging windows of a Tesla showroom in downtown Manhattan today pic.twitter.com/Ak0pXBtY9M
— Human Nature (@Human101Nature) April 23, 2025
The “Tesla Takedown” protests, pitched as grassroots opposition to Elon Musk’s political influence, appear to be anything but spontaneous. Despite their modest size, over 200 coordinated protests unfolded across the country in March, all tightly aligned in timing, message, and execution. Investigations reveal they were organized through high-end platforms like The Action Network—used by union-backed and progressive groups—raising suspicions of professional political orchestration rather than organic activism.
Key players include The Disruption Project, a radical collective with a history of disruptive activism, and its leader Jeff Ordower, who has ties to ACORN and Occupy Wall Street. The campaign’s selective condemnation of violent incidents—such as attempted arsons at Tesla facilities—mirrors a strategy known as “diversity of tactics,” where legal protest and illicit actions coexist under the same movement umbrella, allowing leaders to maintain plausible deniability.
Ultimately, the protests offer a glimpse into a deeper trend: a professionalized activist class driving political violence while enjoying cover from ideologically aligned prosecutors. What presents itself as grassroots outrage increasingly looks like coordinated political theater—aggressive, well-funded, and strategically insulated from consequence. In this case, the refusal to prosecute a state employee accused of blatant, costly vandalism—despite clear evidence—only reinforces the perception that justice is selectively applied. The message is clear: if the cause is progressive enough, accountability becomes optional.
